There are somethings that you just have to wonder about photos. Whether they're what you could call "the real deal" or photoshopped and completely fake like another
person who's doing this particular project has pointed out. I'm going to admit it, I'm not familiar with photoshop and I'm terrible with cropping and the like (I can't even figure out how to make my photos black and white). But then you see a photo like this:
Photo by James Nachtwey
or this:
Photo by Annie Leibovitzand suddenly the question of whether the picture was faked or not doesn't matter anymore.
Leibovitz and Nachtwey are very good at what they do, and what they do is take pictures.
Annie Leibovitz can generally be considered the go-to person for celebrity photographs. Her compositions are such amazing combinations of lighting, setting, and personality that the fact she stages them is irrelevant. Okay, "stages" might be too strong of a word. While it's true that Leibovitz gives general directions to her subjects, a lot of her photos have this strange, intimate quality about them that makes them feel completly natural.
Photo by Annie LeibovitzTake the above for instance. It looks totally natural and unrehearsed. For all I know, it very well may be something that happened at the shoot and Leibovitz was lucky enough to get a shot of it, but I'd be more willing to bet that asked for that particular pose. Either way, it's a beautiful piece. Leibovitz is famous for getting to know her subjects and to ask them to do things that they would probably do anyway for a portrait. And the results tell a lot while saying little. Case in point, the Lennon/Ono picture from the Jan. 22nd, 1981 issue of
Rolling Stone:
Photo by Annie LeibovitzI can not begin to start going on about how beutifully put together this photo is. So I won't. I'll let Leibovitz herself comment on it instead:
"What is interesting is she said she'd take her top off and I said, 'Leave everything on' -- not really preconceiving the picture at all. Then he curled up next to her and it was very, very strong. You couldn't help but feel that she was cold and he looked like he was clinging on to her" (taken from the Rolling Stone website).And then there's James Nachtwey. I have a healthy respect for this man and I wish I could take photos even half as good as his. He's right in the action and I'm beginning to wonder why he isn't dead yet when it comes to his war photos. But everyone talks about those and how amazing they are. So I'm not going to talk about them. I'd rather direct your attention to these particular photos:
Photos by James NactweyI think these two photos in particular draw the neatest comparisons to Leibovitz's work (and hey, that's the point of this post, right?). Whereas Leibovitz's photos are full of life (even the one of the Queen of England up there), almost every photo done by Nachtwey makes the viewer feel quite lonely and melancholic. About 90% of them can be just downright depressing, but that's certainly not a bad thing. Each photo, as was pointed out by
another of my compatriots, has a story behind it. Unlike the previously mentioned compatriot however, I don't believe that the photos need a caption. I believe that a photo should be able to convey itself without words (or a very bare minimum) and Nachtwey's do that. Sure, it's nice to know a bit about what's supposed to be going on, but I don't believe that's the point of his photos. As I, and a
few other of my classmates have mentioned, Nachtwey's photos are his testimony to the world at large and the horrors within (see
his website for the full quote). They are harsh and unforgiving, but that's what makes them so good. And while knowing where these horrors are taking place can lead to trying to change these predicaments, I feel that they lose some of their power that way. Don't ask me why, it's just my own personal thoughts on the matter.
Photo by James NachtweyI also have to say that Nachtwey's photos feel more organic than do Leibovitz's. Do not get me wrong on this. I just spent about half of this post praising Leibovitz for the genius she is, but my God. Nachtwey becomes invisible, it's the only way he can get the photos that he does. Leibovitz may know her subjects, but Nachtwey sees them as they are without them noticing. And that, I think, is what leads to just how amazing and provoking his photos can be. Humanity is a dirty, lonely being on this planet, and that's what he captures. It strikes us because it shows us at our core, at our very being and does not look away.
Photo by James NachtweySources:
All James Nachtwey photos were taken from
www.jamesnachtwey.com Annie Leibovitz photos (in order of appearence):
www.guardian.co.uk condense.frdavideubank.wordpress.com